[smufl-discuss] Re: Additional Glyphs

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[smufl-discuss] Re: Additional Glyphs

Adler, Mark


On 6/3/13 10:40 AM, "Daniel Spreadbury" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>>I would suggest a category for shape-notes. While these noteheads are
>>similar to the geometric noteheads found in Noteheads, they typically
>are
>>heavier and more stylized in dedicated shape-note fonts.
>
>Okay, though as far as I know many of the shaped noteheads in the existing
>range are only ever used for shape note music, so I would be wary of
>unnecessary duplication. Perhaps it would be more correct to embolden or
>modify some of the shapes in the existing range instead?
>

Here is a set of shape note noteheads. As noted above, many of these
geometric shapes are already in the font. Most of these geometric glyphs
are fairly commonly used in percussion notation. A percussionist would
expect to see characters similar to those you have included in Bravura, or
what we ship in Maestro. Noteheads used in shape-note publications
generally are heavier and more stylized, not just bolded. Since each shape
denotes a pitch, these glyphs really do signify something different than
their percussion counterpart.

https://www.dropbox.com/sc/nq5fr2qkd6yn5gu/j3hmcU5oqK

Mark Adler



#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>