[smufl-discuss] Re: Additional Glyphs

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[smufl-discuss] Re: Additional Glyphs

Adler, Mark


On 6/3/13 10:40 AM, "Daniel Spreadbury" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>We've discussed chord symbols a little bit, and my feeling is that we
>shouldn't try within a symbol font to include glyphs that are going to be
>suitable in general for chord symbols, since there is so much variation in
>how they appear. Creating parentheses (in particular) that would be a good
>fit with an arbitrary text font used for chord symbols is challenging.

Yes, it is challenging, but since these are not included with most text
fonts, I believe they are an important part of a music font.



#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>