[smufl-discuss] Re: Additional Glyphs

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[smufl-discuss] Re: Additional Glyphs

Emil B. Wojtacki
Daniel Spreadbury wrote:
> I've already got the AEU scheme used by Turkish and Arabic maqam, and
> I have seen a number of other schemes (e.g. Marc Sabat's Extended
> Helmholtz-Ellis JI Pitch Notation, Sagittal, etc.). If we can agree on
> which schemes to include, I'm very happy to include them.

I think that maqam accidentals could be unified with other accidentals,
on the basis of their visual appearance.

There is a kind of system in the font Tempera, with accidentals meant
for 127 pitch-bend detuning. I think it would be resonable to assign
codepoints for these accidentals (some of them seem to be findings of
font's author, but others are basing on notation used by noticeable
composers). Anyway, some composers use these signs, and it provides some
glyphs for unusual usage (like for a pitches with certain fingering on
woodwinds, where the shape of the accidental may reflect rather the
additions to the fingering than to the sounding pitch).

Including Saggital notation seems reasonable, as well as extended
Helmholtz-Ellis, including glyphs for combination with numbers for
indicating detuning in cents (or millioctaves).

I would also add all the accidentals suggested by Hartmut Lemmel if some
of them are not included (I command the sorting basing on graphical
appearance), and, additionally, naturals with overtone numbers (may be
useful for brass notation).

>> Ornaments: add trills combined with accidentals. I would also suggest
>> leaving much more room for more types of mordents
> We could encode trills with sharp, flat and natural above. Are double
> flats and double sharps needed? What about microtonal accidentals?

I would suggest, instead of encoding all the ornaments with all possible
accidentals, that grace-note variants of common accidentals designed to
fit ornaments, should have their codepoints.

> Yes, I've been exploring this a little bit over the last few days myself.
> I am not sure whether a "long fall" should be encoded separately to a
> "short fall", for example. Perhaps it should.

Probably.


>> Wind techniques: Maybe not the best place to put them, but I would
>> include characters with two, three, and four dots, sans the slur.

Six of them are sometimes required, the same with accents. I think that
scoring application should draw any number of them basing on the actual
number of notes within tremolo-abbreviation. However, for more accents,
a narrower glyph variant would be useful.

--
Emil Wojtacki



#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>