[smufl-discuss] Re: Additional Glyphs

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[smufl-discuss] Re: Additional Glyphs

Adler, Mark
 

On 6/4/13 10:11 AM, "Daniel Spreadbury" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>SPECIAL LINES
>My gut feeling about these proposals is that the line with both variable
>amplitude and frequency is going a bit far for a standard music font;
>perhaps the same is also true for the circular motion line. Can you
>provide a specific justification for why you think these lines are
>standard enough to be included in the standard?

Wavey lines and scribbles, often overlapping, are often used in aleatoric
sections of contemporary music. I most often see them used in percussion
parts. For example, they may be used to indicate how long the
percussionist should be run their finger up and down a set of wind chimes.
I've seen the dovetailing waves and scribbles that I included in Finale
Percussion used in several contemporary scores written for band.
Typically, engravers will overlap several lines, using different waves and
point sizes to create a scribbled look. The same is true for the circular
motion glyphs. In my research for Finale Percussion, I ran across circular
glyphs used that were both above and below the base line along with large
and small versions of the glyph.


Mark Adler



#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>