[smufl-discuss] Re: Arrows (Was: Additional glyphs)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[smufl-discuss] Re: Arrows (Was: Additional glyphs)

Emil B. Wojtacki
On 25-07-2013 09.47, Ahmed Tahar wrote::
> We nearly have all we need in the smufl multi-segment lines category except some arrowheads (up and down would be enough).

Yes, that are just two glyphs.
I don't think it is good idea to use these Unicode-arrows for the arrows
that look like articulation. The way they are drawn in the existing
fonts makes them useful for some other use (e.g. dividing staves). I
also think it would be wrong to use phonetic modifiers, since they are
sometimes needed in the scores.


--
Emil Wojtacki

#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>