[smufl-discuss] Re: Breath marks -- possible anomaly?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[smufl-discuss] Re: Breath marks -- possible anomaly?

uliska
Am 25.03.2014 12:41, schrieb Daniel Spreadbury:

> Urs wrote:
>
>> That's what the book tries to establish to some extent. But I can't tell
>
>> you for all cases what has already become standard practice. What is a
>> point _for_ this book is that its author has been "socialized" with
>> "new" vocal music in it initial years when composers like Lachenmann,
>> Ligeti, Schnebel etc. explored new worlds of expression and notation. I
>> think much of that time has by now been established as common practice.
>
> Unfortunately the British Library doesn't have a copy of this book, and it
> would be quite expensive for me to buy a copy here in the UK.
>
> Do you or anybody else in the community have a copy and would be willing
> to summarise the notations included within it?
>
> Daniel
>

I have a copy and can have a look this evening. But if it would turn out
to be laborious to process I can't promise because I don't have any
spare time.

Urs


#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>