Knut wrote:
> Sorry for being a bit slow, but since these glyphs now are
> proportioned according to the guidelines for text entry, shouldn’t
> they also be positioned differently relative to the baseline like I
> asked in a previous thread?
Well, at the moment, the guidelines that we have discussed and agreed
state that noteheads should be centred on the baseline in fonts intended
for use in scoring applications. It's not beyond the realm of possibility
that an application might want to use these precomposed glyphs in some
situations, though the SMuFL specification does recommend that notes with
stems, flags, beams etc. should be drawn using a combination of primitive
lines and glyphs, since this is more flexible.
If there is consensus in the community that it would be beneficial to
change the registration of the 'Individual notes' and 'Beamed groups of
notes' ranges in the recommendations for fonts for scoring applications,
I'm open to it.
Daniel
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH, Frankenstrasse 18b, D-20097 Hamburg, Germany
Phone: +49 (40) 21035-0 | Fax: +49 (40) 21035-300 | www.steinberg.net
President: Andreas Stelling | Managing Director: Hiroshi Sasaki, Hirofumi Osawa
Registration Court: Hamburg HRB 86534
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
