From: Daniel Spreadbury
> Dave wrote:
>> One place where glyphs look tempting is for "maj", "dim", "aug" etc
>> elements of chord names, and on the whole I like the idea, but even that
>> has problems for international usage.
> There is so much variation in the appearance of elements of chord symbols
that I would rather keep these elements out of SMuFL, except for those
that cannot be found in regular text fonts, hence the inclusion of the
common symbols for dim, half-dim, maj7 and augmented in SMuFL. If there
are other non-text symbols for chord symbols that should be included in
SMuFL, I'm open to suggestions, of course.<
Fair enough - there are pro's and con's.
Dave
David Webber
Mozart Music Software
http://www.mozart.co.uk/
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
