Urs wrote:
> > As currently specified, anchors can't really help with this kind of
> > difference in glyph registration. A SMuFL-compliant font should use
the
> > recommendations for glyph registration as outlined in the spec, which
> > calls for flags to be positioned at x=0. I don't know why the LilyPond
> > fonts don't use this convention, but no doubt it's related to the way
stem
> > connections are handled in LilyPond.
>
> Just for the record: Gonville in Musescore doesn't have any relation to
> LilyPond, it's a completely new implementation.
Apologies, I missed the parenthetical mention of MuseScore and assumed
LilyPond!
Daniel
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH, Frankenstrasse 18b, D-20097 Hamburg, Germany
Phone: +49 (40) 21035-0 | Fax: +49 (40) 21035-300 | www.steinberg.net
President: Andreas Stelling | Managing Director: Hiroshi Sasaki, Hirofumi Osawa
Registration Court: Hamburg HRB 86534
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
