Hartmut Lemmel wrote:
>
> ... there is no clear standard and that it depends on the composer,
> which symbols are used and what their meaning is. Therefore I have
> tried to sort the symbols by graphical attributes rather than by
> musical meaning. I think this is also how the glyph names should be
> designed.
Lot of thanks for that linked pdf-file. I think that this is a good way
for sorting these glyphs.
>
> Some symbols of my collection could be considered as different styles
> of the same thing, like the sharp with an arrow on the left or right
> stem, or the triple barred sharp with equal or different bar length.
> From the coding point of view one could consider the up and down
> arrows also as diacritics. This would save some code points.
Agree, but because of some design issues, I would suggest, that the
accidentals with _single_ arrow should have their codepoints.
--
Emil Wojtacki
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
