Grzegorz Rolek wrote:
>>> From the coding point of view one could consider the up and down arrows also as diacritics. This would save some code points.
>> Agree, but because of some design issues, I would suggest, that the accidentals with _single_ arrow should have their codepoints.
> Not necessarily. You could always make a precomposed accidental-with-arrow glyph and switch to it on the <accidental, combining arrow> glyph sequence. Much like it's done with any other combining diacritic in a font that wants the diacritic to be joined to its base form more nicely than what's possible by the shaper's heuristics or anchoring mechanism.
I know, but, as Joe points out, there is still an issue with
implementation of this behaviour in html.
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
