Daniel Spreadbury:
> So to represent 'mp', SMuFL says you would use U+E571 (m) and U+E750 (p),
> and there could be an optional ligature uniE571_uniE570, with an explicit
> code point somewhere above U+F400, that an application could use instead,
> rather than 'mp' itself being encoded at an explicit code point defined in
> SMuFL.
I think these ligatures could have codepoints in the range for dynamics
(or, to be more precise: an additional subrange could be created).
Similarly, in any range that ligated (composed) characters occur (like
articulation or ornaments), providing a subrange for composed glyphs
would be more convenient than one area above u+f400 for all kinds of
symbols and more clear (both for application developers and end-users)
than keeping different compound ornaments together with ornament strokes.
--
Emil Wojtacki
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
