[smufl-discuss] Re: MusicXML 3.0 symbols missing from SMuFL 0.4

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[smufl-discuss] Re: MusicXML 3.0 symbols missing from SMuFL 0.4

Emil B. Wojtacki
On 05-07-2013 11.51, Daniel Spreadbury wrote::
>> >Right now there are a lot of "Cadence" symbols. The choice for a symbol
>> >named "mordent" seems unusual.
> I am open to suggestions from the community about how better to name the
> ornaments in SMuFL. If all else fails I guess we could resort to "Cadence
> 1", "Cadence 2", etc.
I don't know what was the purpose that they were added, but, as to my
modest knowledge, there are two possibilities:
1. To meet specific needs of typographical appearance.
2. To render different coulés in conjunction with
Pralltriller/tremeblements (e.g. Rameau).

My suggestion is to give them the names like "mordent beginning with a
convex arc starting on the baseline" or "tremblement beginning with a
concave stroke starting high up" (just expressed in better English and
in a more concise way, if possible). This way of naming is precise
enough for the second usage and does not make an impression that using
these glyphs for other reasons (like aesthetic or as a reference to the
certain source) is inappropriate.

--
Emil Wojtacki

#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>