[smufl-discuss] Re: Private use area?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[smufl-discuss] Re: Private use area?

Peter Trubinov
I tend to agree with David and Alex about the need of having smaller
clefs. There's also another reason to include them (among those
already mentioned). When application uses the same glyphs but reduces
them, the thinner lines might simply disappear. Actually that was the
reason why you've introduced version of standard accidentals with
enforced thin lines, for use in smaller sizes. To be able to use the
same approach in application it might be very valuable to have
separate set of clefs for use in smaller sizes too.

Peter


--
Dr. Peter Trubinov
 tel. worldwide: +358 50 486 77 96
 when in Russia: +7 921 438 62 88

#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>