David Webber wrote:
> Unicode encodes the characters C and c (S and s, etc) at separate code
> points. The only difference is one of context in just about exactly the
> same way. The big ones go at the start of sentences (or indeed nouns in
> German), and the small ones go elsewhere. Their original context in
> *fonts* is described by the fact that a font consisted of two containers
> (cases) full of letters, one above the other. The letters C and S were
> found in the 'upper case' and the letters 'c and s' were found in the
> 'lower case'. My own feeling is that the context analogy is so close,
> that one can essentially think of upper and lower case clefs, or, if you
> don't like that, one is a clef and the other is a clef-change.
Well, that's not quite correct. The case-related terms is a much later
artefact of what was originally known as two distinct writing systems,
namely, Roman capitals (developed in Ancient Rome) and Carolingian
minuscule (developed under the Emperor Charlemagne hundreds of years
later, revived in Renaissance by Italian humanists). Use of both systems
in post-medieval practice was interdependent enough that up to this day
you can't express clearly intended meaning without specifying one or the
other. The choice is not strictly mechanical and fonts alone won't do.
Regards,
Grzegorz Rolek
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
