[smufl-discuss] Re: Requests for additional glyphs

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[smufl-discuss] Re: Requests for additional glyphs

Adler, Mark
Essentially, yes the high parentheses and brackets should accommodate two
lines of text. This is a fairly common use with stacked chord suffixes.
Here is a link to an image of our brackets that has a few letters inserted
for reference.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/69745698/Double%20High%20Brackets.png

Mark Adler


On 12/21/13 5:32 PM, "Daniel Spreadbury" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Thanks for these suggestions for new glyphs to include, Michael. On the
>whole they are reasonable, and I will definitely consider them for the
>next revision of SMuFL. I do need clarification in one instance:
>
>>  - Double-high parentheses and brackets for stacked chord symbols. The
>> style for these is often different than scaling a parenthesis or bracket
>> from a different point size. Perhaps these could be added in the chord
>> symbol range in a similar way that the parentheses and brackets are
>> included in the function theory symbols range?
>
>When you say "double-high", do you mean the height of two lines of
>full-height text?
>
>Daniel
>



#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>