For anyone interested in
general application of Python in Fontlab 5:
FontLab is offering a free webinar titled "Easier Font Creation with
Python scripting in FontLab Studio 5", Tuesday, February 24, 2015
9:00 AM - 10:30 AM Pacific Time
http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0015cyhTMnolEeQzVEBWUpZFlM86mp6TxSBLyM1ofyTxmi6ny-xtDmYmcpu6f7g_NZLs58Cs6fcZkG6i2T4g-xhHhe338rjgXyc0KORRW2ApmVPq-hk5bXsE3Hu1GsYaIsINT14IRER03XVdEtoz0GNV6erBBHcxnhH3JWB2IzLy4OUXWDr2DU2XvaQl-_BDzr5uWY7mPxoMIZzFOA6nNOcPQkSHFKGlhoY8LK3a_OlRjD3I8gzrDRAtF-AzIhrvpODR__SDFHwxFQ5QEtHVBb0Al0_qy0BFen29PNWXuEBcYpEDJRUHgfRGtQ9V9z0O3w_LkKi6AfUuqoz5oRmE8Dk-JvPcPwfzOkQ&c=ptrhvToI0eRBe9Ba_byjw7_t3B-_DULjOr9_SOfXTvnHCt2qX
nNNgQ==&ch=-60Hihjw3ATxP7XwGu2OVC0wu7cEajO-bAWdsT04o2ZqY2cZNgdmSQ==
Knut Nergaard wrote:
Thanks, Daniel!
Just to clarify, it’s not my nomenclature. ‘Splayed stems’
is Finale’s term for this kind of notation, while ‘pronged stems’ is
used by Elaine Gould in her book. The term ‘altered unisons’ would
likely also cover tightly spaced situation were the notes are placed
directly opposite each other, with a single vertical stem in the middle,
which could explain the need for a more specific term.
Anyway, reading through the metadata documentation in SMuFL, in
the section GlyphsWithAnchors (page 32) it seems yet another term for
this, ‘split stems’, is used to describe this particular kind of
notation. For some reason I've overlooked SMuFL’s inclusion of these
specific anchor points until now, and with this new information in mind,
I totally get why you don’t see the need for splayed-stem glyphs in the
SMuFL standard. I wholeheartedly agree that scoring applications
ideally should support this kind of notation with the use of primitives,
and the SMuFL metadata clearly makes such support much easier to
implement.
My newly acquired knowledge leads me to another question,
however: Are the anchor points in the ‘splitStem’ category supposed to
be set with any particular stem angle in mind? I find that the angle of
the stem greatly affects the ideal coordinates for the anchor point.
Kind regards,
Knut Nergaard
Knut wrote:
Here’s an example of how splayed stems should look.
Right,
thank you. I know these as "altered unisons"; apologies for not
immediately
picking them up based on your nomenclature
As I mentioned
before, we decided to keep the repertoire of stem glyphs in
SMuFL to
a minimum because in general lines of a fixed length (or, in the
case
of altered unison, angle) are not much use, especially since scoring
applications
will typically handle stems by drawing primitives (lines or
rectangles).
So at present I have no plans to include these in the SMuFL
standard.
Daniel
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Steinberg
Media Technologies GmbH, Frankenstrasse 18b, D-20097 Hamburg, Germany
Phone:
+49 (40) 21035-0 | Fax: +49 (40) 21035-300 | www.steinberg.net
President:
Andreas Stelling | Managing Director: Hiroshi Sasaki, Hirofumi Osawa
Registration
Court: Hamburg HRB 86534
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
#############################################################
This
message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing
list <[hidden email]>.
To
unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To
switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To
switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send
administrative queries to <[hidden email]>
Locked
