Knut wrote:
> I was wondering why the composite glyphs of multiple staccato dots
> with and without slurs above/below are split between the different
> classes (tremolos, wind techniques, string techniques, etc.). Aren’t
> they all used by different types of instruments more or less
> regardless of shape (i.e., essentially all in the tremolo category)?
The groupings are essentially arbitrary, in as much as they are what made
sense to me as I was putting the standard together. We could slice and
dice the current groupings as shown in the specification any which way,
but at this stage, since the glyph names and code points for existing
characters are locked down, it's sort of a moot point.
Daniel
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH, Frankenstrasse 18b, D-20097 Hamburg, Germany
Phone: +49 (40) 21035-0 | Fax: +49 (40) 21035-300 | www.steinberg.net
President: Andreas Stelling | Managing Director: Hiroshi Sasaki, Hirofumi Osawa
Registration Court: Hamburg HRB 86534
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
