Daniel wrote:
> It may be that the best solution to this conflict, long-term, is to
> introduce a new range of characters that duplicate the same basic glyphs,
> but with specific guidelines as to whether the existing "Individual notes"
> range or the new range should have proportions suitable for display
> in-line with text.
This makes me think: Rather than adding yet another range of the "same" characters, could we just decide to use the U+1D100 range for one of these two purposes, since the note glyphs are already duplicated there?
MJ
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
