On 6/3/13 12:44 PM, "Joseph Berkovitz" <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>With this qualification in mind, I think we're OK. But let's build this
>qualification into the standard, such that "compliance" implies the
>inclusion of such alternate glyphs under explicit codepoints.
I agree, this approach makes sense for most common stylistic alternatives.
Mark Adler
MakeMusic Inc.
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
