[smufl-discuss] Re: The question of OpenType

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[smufl-discuss] Re: The question of OpenType

Emil B. Wojtacki
Daniel Spreadbury wrote:

> I don't think that's correct. Although there are 11 combining glyphs
> included in the Unicode Musical Symbols range for creating ornaments,
> there are no actual ornaments that use these combining glyphs defined in
> the range.
For instance, U+E22F is a ligature of ornament stroke 2, ornament stroke
6 and ornament stroke 3; similarly, U+E22D  may be represented as a
string of Ornament stroke 10, ornament stroke 2, ornament stroke 2,
ornament stroke 3. That is the Unicode representation of these ornaments.

--
Emil Wojtacki

#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>