Daniel wrote:
I think you mean zero-width glyphs, rather than zero-width side bearings (which is of course typically the recommendation for the vast majority of SMuFL glyphs).
You're right. Zero-width glyphs was what I meant.
Thanks, now that you mention it, I remember that an example string on the Cavatina web site looks awful probably because of how the spacing is interpreted by the browser.
Knut