David Webber wrote:
> I was worrying about the accessibility of any glyphs which might
> *only* be encoded as variants of others.
I'm afraid that these glyphs can always cause problems. The safe
solution is that all the glyphs are made accessible through mechanisms
required by different languages for correct text display (ligatures,
contextual alternates, perhaps mark positioning).
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
