Glenn wrote:
> While the appearance is very similar to two overlapped whole notes, and
> it could be constructed that way if all else fails, I was surprised to
> find so many variations of whole notes in SMUFL (& Bravura) yet not this
> one.
>
> Is there something I am overlooking (such as a ligature, or alternate
> glyph)? Or is there a recommendation for overlap offset?
You're not overlooking anything: this isn't currently included in SMuFL. I
don't personally think it should be included, since it's really just two
existing glyphs overlapped, rather than a distinctive glyph in its own
right.
It's possible that a SMuFL-compliant font might want to include this
symbol as (e.g.) a ligature, but unless there is an outcry of support from
the community for it, I'd be disinclined to include it in Bravura.
Daniel
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH, Frankenstrasse 18b, D-20097 Hamburg, Germany
Phone: +49 (40) 21035-0 | Fax: +49 (40) 21035-300 | www.steinberg.net
President: Andreas Stelling | Managing Director: Hiroshi Sasaki, Hirofumi Osawa
Registration Court: Hamburg HRB 86534
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>