> I don't personally think it should be included, since it's really just two existing glyphs overlapped, rather than a distinctive glyph in its own right.
I agree that it needn't be included (though those I've seen were indeed distinctive). I recall it only in English scores, e.g., Novello, so to me it seems a local rather than a universal notation. The modern way of placing two noteheads touching takes no more horizontal space than seconds ('back' notes) and the usual slight overlap makes it clear they're simultaneous.
MJ
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <
[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to <
[hidden email]>
Locked
