[smufl-discuss] Re: Stylistic Alternates

Posted by Adler, Mark on
URL: http://smufl-discuss.219.s1.nabble.com/smufl-discuss-Re-Stylistic-Alternates-tp75.html



On 6/3/13 12:44 PM, "Joseph Berkovitz" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>With this qualification in mind, I think we're OK.  But let's build this
>qualification into the standard, such that "compliance" implies the
>inclusion of such alternate glyphs under explicit codepoints.

I agree, this approach makes sense for most common stylistic alternatives.

Mark Adler
MakeMusic Inc.




#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[hidden email]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>